zendra

Havent heard of the place sorry. But if they were in riccarton then they should be going ok( you'l probably know more than me). The main problem is in the CBD where business owners cant even get in to see their building. I almost didnt reply to this because i suspect you know better. As i have said in other posts( im working on my reply on that evolution thread), being atheist doesnt mean you think we came from nothing. The big bang theory proposes the matter was already there, just compressed. yes its funny thats the first time i'v actually mentioned the FSM myself. The point i was making is that Goldliger was asking for proof that a god didn't create the universe etc. I could ask you do you have any proof there isn't a flying spaghetti monster. Would that be fair? Or would it be onto me to provide proof for it?

It depend who you ask, personally the only real inconvenience is having to share my school which actually makes it easier to study( due to the edited school hours).My cousin however has an automatic closing door due to a tilt in the house. What building are you talking about,they differ as well.

Not you, Fred williams

Funnily enough its not, not by much anyway. Cads? You too, btw whats your profile pic?

I dont see how thats related to my post but anyway. I trust that you have come to this conclusion after researching through other biblical texts for other religions, at the least?

You summed it up great thanks. I was also hopng to note that the question said "If the statement is true" but I feel goldliger is now saying something more like 'given the statement is true'.

As far as i know of it the idea is that random mutations can lead to meaningful features. Like that game where you change one letter of a word at a time to create a different one.

If i may, Well if you've already established that a god did create it( which i assume you were able to prove) then yes it is evidence. The problem is that we dont know that it did, perhaps you feel you know and if you could provide evidence that would be great. No offence but theres also no evidence that the flying spaghetti monster didn't create it either, or Thor, or Ra, etc. For there to be proof you need to outline what that proof would have to be. We could show that no signals are being sent to DNA but the theist could say that the signals are different. The problem is the term meaningful. We are the ones that give things meaning. There were these random pulsars that were originally thought to be meaningful signals but little green men