rosewhite

I just decided to check some internet facts about Genesis and naturally Wiki has top position in the search results and regarding Genesis states: Genesis is the Creation Myth. So I thought for a moment and then realised that as Satan said his first task to make people abandon God was to get people to believe himself to be a myth and thereby have The Fall seen as myth and thus God also a myth all he had to do was inspire the editors of Wiki and such popular information sources to ensure Creation was referred to as a myth - which they do so. To do this he would induce people and scientists to foster evolution as a fact in which scenario humans having evolved from spontaneously linked/generated from atoms in the soup of condensed Big Bang dust all talk of a Supreme Being would be seen as nonsense - which is exactly what we find in a lot of scientific papers and the writings of various communists, mystics, and Old Earthers. Wiki contributors push evolution with a zealousness that is amazing! Satan will be proud of them. Wiki says Human Evolution: Primates emerged from other mammals 85 mya. Homo habilis 2.3 mya. etc Wiki's Owner and editors faithfully go along with Satan knowing perfectly well that millions of people around the world will see Wiki's versions as top of each search and will be misled by what they first read. As the owner/founder of Wiki refuses to take any part in running or directing it he is guilty of being one of Satan's chief supporters.

True Evolution is a fact - it is what happens to the human brain when God is accepted as Creator. Suddenly all the lies and nonsense of the Evos is seen for what it is. Maybe accepting God as Creator reverses whatever negative mental effects He caused Adam and Eve to suffer at The Fall? Cain was well aware that after he killed Abel he would face the anger and persecution of his other brothers and sisters and their children who were creating their own family/socialgroups/townships? This would explain why a true believer and real Christian would be totally altered in perceptions, manners, ethics, habits and attitudes to others.

As God put enmity between Adam and Eve and the serpents and also made many plants put out thorns and poisons and made the animals/birds either carnivorous or scared of humans we have to accept that this deep remodelling of mental and physical attributes really did need some fundamental reworking of whatever makes all living things the way they are. So adding or subtracting chromosomes or tinkering with the DNA spiral would be easy for God and Jesus as they created all life in the beginning and all the modified lifeforms from lowest bacterias up to Adam and Eve would then find their physical forms altering along with their mental processes so the previously tame and friendly dinosaurs and lions would now not only be mutually antagonistic but also see Adam and Eve as prey - and Adam and Eve would now find a new sensation in their lives: fear!

Go doesn't always answer prayers because quite often the prayer has the power to get the request themselves or alternatively God might decide that their need is best met by no direct response. This would explain the many devout God believers who died on the cross/fires/arenas and who may have prayed for aid - God possibly thought that the best solution would be to exchange their human body and life for a guaranteed life in the new order.

I doubt that the modified Persian cat would not survive without humans as being a act it will be a natural and successful hunter of smaller mammals and birds even with its squashed nose and being a cat it has claws t resort to in a fight though actually claws area cat's first line of attack.

What all the Evos need to accept is that the dividing line of Cambrian/Pre-Cambrian is an 'hypothetical' divide 'postulated' by agnostics to explain why they find certain fossils in some deep sediment and other fossils in later sediments when in fact just by shaking a few spoons of fertile garden soil in a glass bottle of water they would instantly see FAST SEDIMENTATION occur within a second of stopping shaking. If they called that first settled sediment Pre-Cambrian they would be laughed at. The first sediment would be filled with certain creatures composed mostly of water, and the very last with creatures having swimbladders or lungs and fatty/oily tissue that floated for quite a while.

'they proposed that' - 'the generally accepted hypothesis is' - 'Hawking postulates that' - all these phrases just mean scientists don't know but because something appears to be so it must be so but what appears to be so to a human may not at all be what is so to God?

Anyone come up with an explanation of why great apes have 24 chromosomes or what the extra pair might control?

Bat feathers! Economy design is that bare skin is perfectly acceptable for many creatures - hot and cold blooded. Bats apparently being designed to rest by day and zoom around at night eating night flying insects - do fruit eating bats choose perfect fruit of slightly substandard form or spoiled fruit already attacked by insects? - resting in the damp caves, tunnels and other holes favoured by bats would make feathers more of a nuisance and hindrance than having bare skin with a network of capillaries carrying warm blood? No-one ever turned up a dinosaur fossil with feathers? And I doubt if any of today's frogs and lizards have feathers.

Fast sedimentation during the first and later days of the 18 months Flood would ensure a great deal of variation in apparent fossil layers and I am sure that in the great depths of the ocean there will be immense numbers of perfectly preserved fossils that were swept from the land in the first days of the Flood and subsequently carried down into the depths and buried at various layers by different size of dust particles.

As I wrote earlier, the earth was formless and water covered - probably just as are the giant ice planets today - until land appeared - and as God separated the water by land into seas, plural, it logically follows that there would be lots of coastlines. We know that coastlines quite often have deltas, estuaries, marshes and as the rivers run into the seas the land is obviously higher than the seas. At Genesis 1.20 God said 'Let the waters teem with life' and it happened and at 1.21 He created the 'Great Sea Monsters' and swarms of fish and commanded them to be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters'. We know that fish can be stocked at high density 'swarming' in well aerated water and given plenty of food will quite happily breed to capacity. We know that rivers carry plenty of minerals to the seas and plenty of vegetation - it is perhaps the buried masses of Flood vegetation that give the spectacular gas eruptions that are known to have sunk drill rigs in the colder waters especially in northern Russia - so we must accept that the early seas and oceans would be very fertile as would all the aquatic life - as was the North Sea 'solid with herring' and the Grand Banks 'cod so tight together it seemed possible to walk on them' before they were fished out. We know that sharks and other 'predatory-carnivorous fish will quite happily swim among its prey until hunger occurs so we must accept the Bible truth that the early seas had masses of every sort of fish happily coexisting as vegetarians in a food chain that started at the top with fresh leaves and seaweeds and ended in the ooze at the bottom with minute organisms that happily exist on the droppings of the other creatures. Evolutionaries have been so brainwashed by Hollywood and Satan's lies and only seeing life in a post-Flood world that they really have no comprehension of how abundant the vegetation, land animals, birds and insects and aquatic life must have been when Adam and Eve wandered around their idyll. When God cursed creation because of their sin it was somehow transformed or 'mutated' really so that all creatures became carnivorous to some degree and all plants started growing thorns and having poisonous juices and stings. It would be interesting to know at what point in 'the fossil record' the first evidence of carnivorous behaviour occurred. We know fish, reptiles and crocodilians kill themselves by trying to eat other fish that is too big it chokes them and there are fossils of this but those fossils show the fish, reptile or animal to be both complete kinds not some half formed thing. If neither of these fish are around today as seems the case it cannot be because they were a 'kind' that was evolving into another so they must have become extinct when the whole waters of the Earth had a dramatic change. Sir David Attenborough - the man responsible for much Evo-think today - looks at the mass of trilobites in the Burgess Shales as evidence for some inability in them to evolve and their mass death as some mysterious event 550 million years ago. Yet the very mass of these creatures of all sizes and ages shows that they must all have been happily coexisting and mating for all they were worth in waters that was very congenial to them. The only explanation for their mass extinction with many of them showing they died a 'painful' - if fish can feel pain - or an unexpected death must be sudden immersion in a mass of fine sediment that washed over them faster than they were able to swim away from it. All fish can swim really fast and can easily outswim sediment flowing into their water from normal rains, erosion etc but the Flood sediments were such a mass that most of these trilobites were suddenly and fatally trapped in it and 4400 years later can be found in untold numbers in the Burgess. If sea bottom creatures like trilobites were trapped in vast numbers then obviously vast quantities of other creatures must have been killed and trapped but either due to their particular shape, composition, preferred habitat and food sources would be found at different levels in the sedimentary fossil chain and so make Evos think they died millions or tens of millions of years apart. We know coral atolls that have existed for thousands of years have died off in just a few years when nearly mining has drifted sediment onto them. As the mass of trilobites proves the seas to have been very pleasant and fertile then there must have been masses of other bigger creatures swimming around and the sea shores would be excellent browsing for many land animals as would the various deltas or swampy areas leading down to the shores. The animals and birds and all humans would not know they were going to drown in the Flood until the moment they were killed either by the tsunamis from the 'fountains of the great deep' or by direct weight of falling water from the sky. Today's tsunamis destroy most light things in their path and the flash floods carry vast amount of soil and flotsam to the seas though I never been able to find video of what the close seabed looks like as the tsunami and floods finally recede and the sediments settle out. We know the coal measures are mostly formed of giant tree ferns and the Whitby Jet used for Victorian jewellery was Monkey Puzzle tree then the earth must have had a warmer moister climate that ensured it could hold a vast amount of vegetation and sea life and animal life that now exists only in say the Amazon or similar places. The first sailors to reach Madeira said it was so thickly forested as to be impossible to explore so they set it on fire and sailed away for a year - such extreme fertility might easily have been the norm for the new earth and the coming Paradise Earth. If those sailors had been Evos they could have explored to see what rare life evolved itself there?

Maybe an explanation what the pre-Flood world MAY have looked like and how this may have been especially susceptible to making the fossil record that so baffles the evolutionists today would help the evo's and their disciples come to understand how all their thinking is wrong? As we know God created Earth and it was formless and then land appeared - could it be that the original area of land was quite small and may have been lowlying and swampy rather that the arid desert 'barren inhospitable' usually thought of as the land outside The Garden of Eden? I'll expand this topic later.

Direct sunlight is bad for us as it gives skin cancers and as cancer cells are know to spread around the body who knows in what other diseases direct UNFILTERED sunlight is implicated?

actually as we didn't evolve from anything but were created as perfect humans needing only vegetable matter for food and plain water for drink we had no need to evolve. As for standing in the sun creating our own food we do get Vitamin D by standing in the sun and who knows what other yet undiscovered health benefit from FILTERED sunlight - sunlight filtered through the water canopy that fell in The Flood and the lack of which canopy gives us rainbows.

Hi, Everyone, Rose White here. Just found the website and love it. I surf the web regularly and am amazed at how widespread is belief in evolution and how viciously they will defend it despite any argument I put forward, but I continue showing example after example at them using science, technology and biology to show how wrong their thinking and beliefs are. I now refers to them collectively as Pondslimers as they believe that is what they all evolved from. Perhaps we need to point out to all these evolutionists that all the theories they believe in include the phrase 'If we postulate...'. We need to educate people as to what postulate means - fairy tale, dream, fantasy?